Publicado em 28 de set de 2014
In a free market, some individuals will engage in corrupt business activities. One argument for government regulation holds that it reduces the amount of business corruption. Opponents of government regulation respond that free markets have the internal resources to control most business corruption—and that government regulation itself leads to corruption, both more and worse. How do we evaluate these competing arguments about whether corruption is worse in free-market or government-regulation systems? In this lecture, Stephen Hicks discusses both sides’ arguments and bring to bear upon them the empirical work of this generation’s social science.
ABOUT STEPHEN HICKS:
Stephen Hicks is Professor of Philosophy at Rockford College and executive director of the Center for Ethics and Entrepreneurship there. His works include “Ayn Rand and Contemporary Business Ethics,” "Nietzsche and the Nazis," and Explaining Postmodernism: Skepticism and Socialism from Rousseau to Foucault.
ABOUT STEPHEN HICKS:
Stephen Hicks is Professor of Philosophy at Rockford College and executive director of the Center for Ethics and Entrepreneurship there. His works include “Ayn Rand and Contemporary Business Ethics,” "Nietzsche and the Nazis," and Explaining Postmodernism: Skepticism and Socialism from Rousseau to Foucault.
Nenhum comentário:
Postar um comentário